January 31, 2001
HistoryChannel.com has just launched a
new feature called the
HISTORYCHANNEL.COM NETWORK, which is a searchable, categorized index of
the best history sites on the Web.
I am writing to invite you to submit an
application for
http://www.secondwi.com/ and have
it listed in our search engine and
directory. Membership is totally FREE, and it allows you to
leverage the traffic, content and brand power of HistoryChannel.com to
benefit your site
January 26, 2001
Hunley
Researchers Move Slowly, Viewers Disappointed
01/24/2001
Civil War Interactive
Scientists who had hoped to begin excavating silt from inside the rear
of
the Confederate submarine Hunley were delayed yesterday when it took
most of
the day to move equipment into position.
Also distressed were some visitors, including out-of-town tourists, who
had
hoped to see the historic first scoop.
"We thought we'd be a part of history," said Larry Renninger,
of Pittsburgh,
who was visiting with his wife, Carolyn. "But we have to catch a
flight out
of here tomorrow. We'll be back later, I guess."
The Reningers and the others had paid $5 to watch the exploration of the
ship on a view screen outside the lab where the vessel rests in a
holding
tank. The lab has now been closed to tourists to allow the researchers
to
work. Some 50,000 people toured the lab since public tours began being
offered last October, generating around $600,000 that will be applied to
the
research effort, officials said.
Attempts have been made to investigate the interior of the Hunley with
everything from high-powered X-ray machines to sonographs, according to
researcher Harry Pecorelli.
"She has blocked us on every front," Pecorelli said. The silt
and mud which
has filled the vessel is opaque to the wavelengths used by the team. The
interior of the sub just shows up as a white blob, they said.
They will use stainless steel spoons and trowels to dig out the first
compartment to be entered in the rear of the sub. A hole was torn in the
hull at that point, possibly decades ago, probably by a dragging ship
anchor. They anticipate this part of the project will take two weeks or
so.
It is hoped that closer inspection of the inside of the rivets holding
the
hull in place will make it possible to figure out how to remove them in
order to access the rest of the interior of the vessel.
Pecorelli said researchers discovered the rivets were countersunk so its
surface would be smoother and more streamlined according to reports in
the
Columbia, S. C., media
An additional impediment to researchers has been the thickness of the
sub's
hull, as well as a half-inch-thick gray-green concretion, a
concrete-like
coating of shells, stone and sand. When X-ray machines have been used to
try
to penetrate the 3-foot-wide hull, the sediment inside has served as a
natural shield, Pecorelli said.
Nine oak coffins have been brought to the warehouse adjacent to the
Hunley
lab. Plans have been made to bury the sailors in the "Hunley
plot" in
Charleston's Magnolia Cemetery next to two earlier crews that died in
the
sub.
Civil War Interactive, 2001
www.civilwarinteractive.com
Confederate sub rises again
The Hunley harbors clues to how 9 men died
Gregg Zoroya
01/22/2001
USA Today
(Copyright 2001)
When archaeologists this week begin exploring a Confederate submarine
that
was pulled out of the ocean off Charleston, S.C., in August, there are
relics they certainly expect to find -- sidearms, an ancient depth
gauge,
the Civil War-era technology that drove this famous iron-riveted craft
through the water.
They also intend to unravel the mystery of why the H.L. Hunley, operated
by
eight men working at hand cranks to turn the propeller while a ninth
steered, went down after sinking a Union warship the night of Feb. 17,
1864.
But other treasures, some that researchers say may be too much to hope
for,
may be inside the submersible -- clothing and personal effects of the
crew,
maybe even a legendary charm that, according to history, was always kept
close by the boat's commanding officer, Lt. George Dixon.
It is said to be a $20 gold piece given to Dixon by his fiancee, one he
carried in his pocket at the Battle of Shiloh. Struck by a Union bullet
in
that fight, Dixon always felt his life was saved because the ball
penetrated
the coin so that it became bell-shaped, with the bullet imbedded inside.
Dixon hung on to it as a lucky amulet.
"It would be just too good to be true to have something like that
actually
come out of the Hunley," says project historian Mark Ragan, whose
twin
passions are submarines and the Civil War. "But I think everybody
would
totally flip if they found the thing."
Up until this week, a team of underwater archaeologists, conservators
and
specialized technicians have been working for months to stabilize,
monitor
and map the exterior of the 40-foot craft. The Hunley has been resting
in an
assembly of struts, nylon slings and foam cushions, suspended at the
same
45-degree angle it was found on the ocean floor, in a 90,000-gallon tank
at
the Warren Lasch Conservation Center in the Old Charleston Navy Base in
North Charleston.
Led by Robert Neyland, chief underwater archaeologist with the U.S.
Navy,
the team will begin excavation efforts this week by first scooping
sediment
out of a 3-by--foot gash in the starboard stern that conservators
believe
may have been caused by anchor chains dragging the bottom after the
Hunley
sank. After exploring the interior of this hole, which they surmise may
give
them a look inside one of the ballast tanks, the team will begin the
painstaking effort of slowly drilling out rivets and removing upper-hull
iron plates from the submarine. From there, researchers intend to
explore
the interior in a process that could take weeks or months, carefully
conducting studies at each step to avoid structurally damaging the
craft.
Neyland says special sonar imaging developed at the Massachusetts
Institute
of Technology has shown that there are layers of material along the
bottom
of the sub's interior, from stem to stern, particularly in the
lower-sitting
forward area. The rest of the submarine is filled with oxygen-depleted
silt
or sediment that might have acted as a strong preservative, Neyland
says.
He believes that material could likely contain what's left of the crew
and
their personal effects, perhaps even shreds of cloth and leather.
"I think the odds are extremely good that what we'll find is the
skeletal
remains of the crew," says Neyland, whose underwater resume
includes
recovery work on the USS Monitor and NASA's Liberty Bell 7 space
capsule.
Soft tissue remains of the crew are unlikely. But not impossible. To be
prepared, the team has on hand the services of a medical examiner. With
skeletal remains, forensic scientists can possibly reconstruct what the
Confederate crew looked like.
"One of the really exciting things is going to be putting faces on
these
men," says Neyland. "You can actually look into the faces of
the men who
took this ship out."
The Hunley initially was a disaster as a naval weapon. Financed by a New
Orleans lawyer, Horace Lawson Hunley, the ship had sunk twice during
trial
runs, killing 13 members of two crews, including Hunley. Each time it
was
recovered, re-equipped and sent out again in hopes of breaking the Union
blockade of Charleston. Under Dixon's leadership, the nine men who took
the
Hunley on its final mission became proficient at navigating the 7-ton
vessel, with its claustrophobic crew compartment, miles out to sea.
On Feb. 17, they successfully rammed a "torpedo" or 135-pound
explosive into
the hull of the USS Housatonic, a Union warship anchored four miles
offshore. The resulting explosion sunk the steam- driven Housatonic in a
matter of minutes, killing five of its crew. But then, inexplicably, the
Hunley went down and remained undiscovered for more than 130 years,
until a
team led by author and adventurer Clive Cussler located it in 1995.
Under the auspices of the Hunley Commission, a state organization formed
to
raise and protect the submarine, a 600-ton crane was used to raise the
craft. It was covered in a thin, hard layer of concretion, a mixture of
corroded iron and seawater carbonates. The ship's rescuers found the
craft
in remarkable condition, right down to the glass in the portholes that
remained fully intact.
"In a way," says Neyland, "it's kind of like we found the
Wright brothers'
aircraft buried in the sand dunes."
GRAPHIC, B/W, Sam Ward, USA TODAY (Diagram); PHOTO, B/W, Hunley.org;
PHOTO,
B/W, Barbara Volgaris; Caption: First sub to sink a ship: The Hunley is
transported to a storage tank, after 136 years at the bottom of the sea.
News
Scientists to get first look into Rebel sub
Hunley
Chris Burritt
STAFF
01/21/2001
The Atlanta Journal - Constitution
Home
(Copyright, The Atlanta Journal and Constitution - 2001)
North Charleston, S.C. --- Nearly 137 years after the H.L. Hunley sank,
presumably with nine Confederate sailors aboard, archaeologists start
Monday
extracting the sediment shrouding one of the Civil War's lingering
mysteries.
"What are they going to find in there?" wondered Walter Edgar,
a professor
of Southern studies at the University of South Carolina.
Scientists plan to start what's expected to be a three-month excavation
by
removing the densely packed sand and silt from a hole in the back of the
submarine, the first in history to sink an enemy warship. Just big
enough to
put an arm inside, the hole opens into a ballast tank, not the central
section where the crew propelled the vessel with a hand crank.
To reach the crew compartment, scientists plan to cut the Hunley's
boilerplate skin and lift sections along the sub's top side, said Hunley
Commission Chairman Glenn McConnell, a Republican state senator from
Charleston.
Researchers will lower the chilled water in the green tank where the
barnacle-encrusted Hunley has been submerged since August. A crew
recovered
it from 30 feet of murky water near the shipping channel leading into
Charleston Harbor.
A barge transported the sub to a North Charleston laboratory for what's
estimated to be the $17 million recovery, excavation and preservation of
the
historic sub.
The Hunley was the weary Confederacy's last-ditch secret weapon against
the
Union blockade of Charleston Harbor.
In the darkness of Feb. 17, 1864, it rammed the USS Housatonic with a
long
battering ram affixed with 90 pounds of black powder. As it backed away,
the
Hunley sank, filling with sediment and covered by sand and silt, a
process
that scientists speculate could have preserved human skin and hair in
addition to the bones.
Researchers don't know whether the sediment will remain stuck together
or
crumble, McConnell said. So they've taken steps to support what
scientists
believe will be contents strewn with bones and artifacts such as
navigational tools, guns and possibly a gold coin, a gift to the sub's
commander, Lt. George Dixon, from his sweetheart.
"It ought to be like a time capsule," said Randy Burbage, a
Hunley
Commission member who is chairman of the Confederate Heritage Trust, a
coalition of Charleston-area heritage groups. "Everything they had
in there
that night ought to be in there, including the gold coin."
Working with high-tech scanning technology, scientists have mapped the
hull,
which has helped them decide how to open the Hunley. Sonar images of the
sub's interior revealed bursts of gold, which researchers believe could
pinpoint artifacts and other objects with consistencies different from
the
sediment.
"We got a reading that indicated there are artifacts concentrated
around the
front end," said McConnell, a finding that bolsters the theory that
the
Hunley sank bow first, causing the sub's contents to slide in that
direction.
In the crew compartment, he said, the sonar images "suggest there
is
something there other than sediment. It gave us a very eerie
feeling."
What's actually inside has been left to the imagination of the thousands
of
people who've viewed the Hunley during sold-out tours of the North
Charleston lab.
The tours end today, but public viewing of the excavation will not.
Cameras
in the lab will broadcast what's happening onto big- screen TVs in an
adjacent room, where Friends of the Hunley has set up a store selling
Hunley
memorabilia, including books, clothing and foam can insulators.
For $5 a day, people can sit on bleachers and watch the recovery. Also,
the
TV broadcast can be viewed on the Friends of the Hunley Web site by
people
who purchase charter memberships.
The Web broadcast "has been one of the huge selling points,"
said Kellen
Butler, in charge of memberships for Friends of the Hunley. So far, more
than 4,000 people have purchased memberships, she said.
The group has sold memberships as far away as Poland, while the tours
drew a
more regional crowd, including South Carolina schoolchildren and
Charlestonians such as 44-year-old Martin Jensen.
"History is always exciting," he said, especially so in this
instance
because of the likelihood of human remains.
"There is a dignified way of doing things," he said, "and
I think they have
done it to the best of their ability."
Burbage said officials hope to bury the remains next fall in
Charleston's
Magnolia Cemetery.
> ON THE WEB: Friends of the Hunley: www.hunley.org
Thanks Scott:
I
was looking through a just-published book/CD combo called
"The
Civil War on the Web:
A Guide to the Very Best Sites"
http://www.scholarly.com/bkdetail.asp?0-8420-2849-8>.
It
lists only a very few Wisconsin regimental sites, but the 2nd's was one
of them,
as was my 15th. Congratulations! -- Scott
Scott C. Meeker
15th
Wisconsin Webmaster
http://www.15thwisconsin.net
January
14, 2001
Gods and Generals
Gods and Generals is
the prequel to The Killer Angels, the novel upon which the film Gettysburg
was based. Written by Jeff Shaara (son of Michael Shaara, author of The
Killer Angels), Gods and Generals will soon be a major motion
picture written and directed by Ron Maxwell.
The movie will be filmed in and around Sharpsburg, Maryland, the site of the Antietam Battlefield, and on actual historic locations in Virginia and West Virginia.
Many of the actors from the movie Gettysburg will reprise their roles in the new film, which also features the new characters Stonewall Jackson, Mary Anna Morrison Jackson, Myra Hancock, Mary Custis Lee, and Fanny Chamberlain.
Filming is scheduled for Summer-Fall 2001.
Gods and Generals and Jeff Shaara
http://www.ronmaxwell.com/ggenerals.html
January 13, 2001
Notes from "If This Is War"
Gary Van Kauwenbergh
I recently reread Alan Gaff's book, "If This Is War", and
thought I'd share the notes I made on some items I thought were
interesting. When reading the notes, bear in mind this book only covers
the period of time when the unit began forming in late April of 1881
until shortly after the battle of Bull's Run, which was fought on July
21 of that year.
1. Scott's vs. Hardee's: Gaff says the companies did start using Scott's
when they began forming at Camp Randall, but mixed in Hardee's so
quickly that within 2-3 months, were using nothing but Hardee's. The
unit was still wearing gray when they switched completely to Hardee's.
Gaff makes five references to the drill manuals the 2d Wisconsin used to
train with.
A.. Page 301. [While at Camp Randall]: "The Second Wisconsin began
its military training with the officers reading from General Winfield
Scott's Infantry Tactics."
B. Page 98. [Early June, 1861, still at Camp Randall]: "The
companies were drilled during the day after their commanders had spent
the evenings mastering the intricacies of Winfield Scott's Infantry
Tactics, first published in 1840, and W.J. Hardee's Rifle and Light
Infantry Tactics, originally printed in 1855."
C. Page 155. [After reaching Virginia]: "Although the tactics of
Scott and Hardee were both in vogue, Scott's manual was gradually
superseded and one of the Badgers could claim, "We are drilling
Hardee altogether, every movement being made in double quick time, a
change which is liked very much.""
D. Page 303. July 2, 1861: "...after the regiment reached General
McDowell's Army...the use of Scott's manual was gradually replaced by
William J Hardee's Rifle and Light Infantry Tactic, until one Badger
wrote on July 2, "We are drilling Hardee altogether.""
E. Page 293. [August 4, 1861, After Bull's Run]: "...with the
arrival of [Col Edgar] O'Connor [as commander], the regimental drill was
officially changed from Scott to Hardee."
2. Muskets:
A. Page 129. June 22, 1861: "that evening seven hundred and eighty
Harper's Ferry muskets, with 40 rounds of buckshot were distributed
equally throughout the regiment.
B. Page 145. "By he afternoon of July 1[, 1861], the entire
regiment was armed with Harper's Ferry flintlock muskets that bad been
altered to the percussion system.
C. Page 303. "... it was not until the Second Wisconsin marched
into Virginia on July 2 that every soldier had his own musket.
D. Page 161. "Captain Colwell's Company B was issued eighty-four
new Springfield rifled muskets on July 13[, 1861]."
E. Page 284: On July 23, after the battle, President Lincoln and
Governor Randall review the unit, and the muskets are pronounced
"unacceptable."
3. Miscellaneous:
A. Page 117: "Each man carried a knapsack bearing his company
letter, a haversack and a three pint canteen covered with flannel."
B. Music in camp, page 105: "Every night when the campfires were
blazing there would be groups of men gathered around amateur musicians
playing the jewsharp, the bones, the banjo, the tambourine, the guitar
or violin, ("drawing the tail of a horse across the bowels of a
cat" as the
boys liked to call it.)"
C. Numerous references are made to the oppressive heat, and men
suffering from heat stroke during the battle of Bull's Run. Even though
the unit had newly issued gray cotton uniform available, but the unit
wore their older gray wool uniforms during the battle. "The gray
summer uniforms were
left in camp because it was felt the soldiers needed the old wool
clothes to keep warm in the cool nights." (page 165)
D. The original flagstaff on the regimental national colors was broken
by a cannon ball the took of the head of color bearer (page 197.) During
the retreat, the colors would have been captured by confederate
horsemen, except for the efforts of two musicians who threw down their
instruments in defense of the colors (page 237.) The first regimental
flag was not presented to the unit until after the battle (pages
288-289.)
E. Page 69. Cpt. Allen sings "The Star Spangled Banner" at a
rally in Mineral Point on May 4, 1861. The song is not yet the
recognized as our national anthem.
4. Humorous Quotes:
A. Page 106. "The folks in Racine were disturbed by the news that
the boys of their company "played cards, drank whisky and stole
chickens [on] Sundays."
B. Page 135, from Cpt. Tom Allen, concerning the regimental band:
"...our brass band afforded us daily exhibitions of tunes of
excruciating melody, and of marching time, to which no man, except a
broken-legged cripple, could possibly keep step."
C. Page 146. "[A member of Company K], while on picket, shot a cow
that failed to answer his challenge."
January 11, 2001
Thought this might interest you if you
hadn't seen it already. Laurie
-----
Subject: News for a Civil War buff 1/11/2001
HOW DO WE REMEMBER THE CIVIL WAR?
GO ONLINE TO SEE
01/10/2001
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Did you think that the Civil War ended in 1865? Not in the memory of
Missourians. Even if you are not a Civil War buff, you may be
interested in learning more about how St. Louisans continue to remember the
conflict. From Civil War re-enactors to Hispanic Confederates to the songs of the
North and South, you will find rich historical content at the Civil War sites
on our network, which you can visit at
http://communities.postnet.com/stlouis/history2
If you feel the
call to serve your nonprofit organization by joining our growing network of
Community Web Sites, call 314-340-8323 to find out how.
Good stories can be accurate:
The popularity of the past is proved by Jeff Shaara's historical
novels
Joseph Frey
National Post
01/09/2001
National Post
>
"It's the survival of a nation's culture, if you can keep
young people interested in their own history," says Jeff Shaara, historical
novelist and author of the New York Times best-sellers Gods and Generals, The
Last Full Measure and Gone for Soldiers.
"My generation, the Baby Boomers, in the United States broke
with our history. It was no longer cool to look back; anyone who did was
considered a right-wing nut. It was a generation later when people started to
come back to American history, based on the PBS Civil War series, my father's
novel -- The Killer Angels, by Michael Shaara, which won the Pulitzer
Prize -- and Ted Turner's movie Gettysburg. They started realizing that when
you get beyond the names, dates and places, it's interesting."
Now 48, Jeff Shaara began writing his first novel six years ago
after a successful career as a rare coin dealer. A natural storyteller,
Shaara is not constrained by the academic historian's dry approach to history.
"I
read historical fiction, and when it is done well, it can be
superb," says Jack
Granatstein, a well-known historian who is the former director of
the Canadian War Museum. "I have always admired Gore Vidal's
historical novels because he makes a point of getting the history right. It seems to
me that historical fiction can get both children and adults interested in
the subject [in a way] that historians cannot. Historians usually write dreadfully and spoil it for many people."
Handcuffed by time constraints, many teachers, either out of
routine or necessity, fall back on teaching dates, names and places, though the
current vogue is to drop dates, which deprives students of chronological
context. A frequent speaker at teachers' associations, this past November,
Shaara addressed the American National Convention of English Teachers. Increasingly, teachers are using his novels to teach Civil War
history, since Shaara's books are historically accurate. He develops complex
characters, provides insight into behind-the-scenes intrigue and in
the process captivates students who are normally turned off by history.
"My great joy in telling these stories, whether it is the
Civil War stories, the Mexican-American War or now the American Revolution, is that I
love erasing false myths," says Shaara. "I did it with Ulysses
Grant; the idea that Grant was a drunkard is simply not true. Now I'm tackling false
myths surrounding Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin.... Legends unfortunately
explode themselves into history books and popular culture. I so try
to get away from that."
Shaara is leery of modern biography because it is often written by someone
who is trying to establish a reputation as a biographer or get
tenure at a university and is desperate to publish something new -- and often
revisionist.
>
Instead, he gets into the original writings of his characters and
their contemporaries; he reads research materials from various decades and
takes himself out of today and modern interpretation. Reading Shaara's
books, the stories are told from the characters' point of view, and you feel as
if you are there. It works because he gets into the characters' minds.
Rise to Rebellion, the first of Shaara's two novels on the American Revolution, will be published on June 26. The novel starts with the
Boston Massacre in 1770 and ends shortly after the signing of the
Declaration of Independence in 1776. The main characters are George Washington,
Benjamin Franklin, John and Abigail Adams and the British general Thomas
Gage.
>
The minor characters include Jefferson, John Hancock and Guy
Carleton, who in 1775 successfully defended Quebec City from the combined forces
of the American generals Richard Montgomery and Benedict Arnold and
inflicted upon Washington his first big failure. Franklin almost freezes to death
in the Quebec wilderness while trying to convince French Canadians to join
the rebellion against Britain.
>
Combining military action and personal intrigue, Rise to Rebellion examines
why the American Revolution started. Through the eyes of Franklin
and others, a story unfolds, delving into cultural sensitivities,
political plunders and economic interests from both the British and American
perspectives, showing how misunderstandings were aggravated by
distance and slow communications. "One of the things that is hard for
today's Americans to realize is how fiercely loyal we were to King George III. We were
English subjects who were by and large happy. We liked the King. It was
Parliament and the ministries who were the bad guys," says Shaara. When
Thomas Paine published Common Sense in January, 1776, the pamphlet cut to the
quick and outlined to the English colonists why they did not need a monarch.
This was something that had never been explained to them before, and
loyalties quickly changed.
>
Movies, like historical novels, can effectively convey a nation's
history to a mass audience, as the Australians have proven with movies such as
Breaker Morant, Gallipoli and -- with a Canadian subject -- Black Robe.
"There are so many good stories in history," says Shaara.
"Why Hollywood [sometimes] has to modify history is a travesty. Beginning this
August, Ron Maxwell, who produced Gettysburg, will start filming my two Civil
War novels. I trust him to stay true to the books and to history;
otherwise, I would not have agreed to the projects, regardless of how much they
paid me."
The more people KNOW about Civil War history, the easier it will be
to save the battlefields. If you belong to a Round Table, be active in
it and help it grow.
>
If you don't belong to a RT, maybe we can help you start one. We'll
be happy mail a copy of our _Civil War Round Table Organization Guide_
to any one who would like to take a shot at starting a new CWRT to join the
nearly 400 others which are in active operation today.
>
Or, if you'd like to join one, tell us where you live (and if it's
in a small town, tell us the larger towns in your vicinity) and we'll
tell you if there is a Civil War Round Table nearby.
NEWS
3 states wrapped up in flag battle 'Stars and bars' an incendiary
issue in
S.C., Miss. and Ga.
Larry Copeland
USA Today
(Copyright 2001)
ATLANTA -- As the 2001 session of the Georgia Legislature opens
today, a bitter fight is looming over the Confederate battle emblem that has
been part of the state flag since 1956.
The governor, Democrat Roy Barnes, has kept a low profile on the
flag question, hoping that state legislators will find "common
ground" on the issue.
>
Any search for common ground might be short-lived, though.
>
Some Republican state politicians figure a flag fight would inflict political damage on Barnes and the Democratic majority but benefit
themselves.
>
And African-American activists, who have threatened an economic
boycott similar to that imposed on South Carolina, say they are running out
of patience.
Nearly 136 years after the end of the Civil War, Georgia is one of
three Southern states where the Confederate flag issue threatens to
dominate political debate in the new year.
* In Mississippi, which struggled much of last year over whether to
change its flag design, voters could decide in April whether to keep the
current flag.
* In South Carolina, which last year moved a Confederate flag from
atop the state Capitol's dome to a nearby monument after the boycott, both
sides vow to fight on.
The Confederate battle flag, blue diagonal bars studded with 13
stars and set against a red background, means very different things to the two
sides.
Southern heritage groups say the battle emblem is an honored
historical symbol and that efforts to mothball it are part of an unrelenting
assault on their regional culture.
Many black activists and others view it as a vestige of slavery that
has been commandeered by neo-Nazis and hate groups.
The flag incites intense passions on both sides -- passions that
defy easy solutions.
Flag-weary South Carolina residents hoped the issue had been put to
rest there after the boycott and a sustained turn in the national
spotlight. Instead, an alliance called Save Our Flag held a rally Saturday at
the Capitol to urge legislators to restore the flag to the dome.
The NAACP, which initiated the boycott, plans a demonstration Jan.
15 -- Martin Luther King Jr. Day -- to express dissatisfaction that the
flag is still flown on Statehouse grounds.
South Carolina has become a rallying cry for both sides in other
states.
"That's helping us," says Tunica, Miss., attorney Greg
Stewart, who's leading an initiative to save the 106-year-old state flag, which has
the Rebel banner in the top left corner. "One of our arguments is
saying, 'Hey, South Carolina tried to compromise, and there's still a boycott
there. So why compromise?' "
Stewart, who also is a member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans,
says he expects Mississippians to vote about 70%-30% to retain the current
flag in a vote in April. No one on either side, Stewart says, likes the
proposed new design. It has 20 white stars, representing the 13 original states
and the nations or groups that have controlled Mississippi, including Native
Americans.
But former governor William Winters, who chaired a commission that recommended a new design, says he believes that enough voters are
ready for a change. "I'm optimistic that once people of Mississippi
understand what is involved in this important symbol for our state, they will choose a
symbol that is unifying rather than divisive," he says.
Some Georgians also are looking to South Carolina -- but for
different reasons.
>
"I am praying that we find some middle ground. If we don't,
Georgia is going to be devastated. It's going to be a hundred times worse than South
Carolina," Georgia state Rep. Tyrone Brooks says.
The Atlanta Democrat will introduce legislation today to restore the pre-1956 flag and make the current banner the "Memorial Flag of
Georgia," to be placed in archives and museums.
U.S. Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., has said he will be a plaintiff in a
federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Georgia flag.
Lewis and others say the flag violates the 14th Amendment's equal
protection clause and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Many Georgians share the sentiment of Andrew Young, former Atlanta
mayor and onetime United Nations ambassador who is one of the state's
best-known African-Americans. He urged legislators to ignore the flag
controversy and concentrate on such issues as election and education reforms.
Jan 06, 2001
Civil War center director starts task
BY GARY ROBERTSON
TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER
Alex Wise has left his post as director of the Virginia Department
of Human
Resources to become the full-time executive director of the proposed
Tredegar National Civil War Center.
The center would re-examine the roles of Union and Confederate
forces and would tell the story of African-Americans in the war.
The 10-year project would be developed around the site of the
Tredegar Gun Foundry on the north bank of the James River in downtown Richmond.
It would be next door to the Richmond Civil War Visitor Center operated by
the
National Park Service.
"The first major task is to start to raise planning
funds," said Wise, who is renting office space on East Franklin Street in Shockoe Bottom.
Planning costs for the first phase of the project - a
12,000-square-foot exhibit space - will require raising upward of $1 million, Wise
said.
Gov. Jim Gilmore has renewed his commitment to the Civil War center
by pledging $500,000 in the biennial budget, half of which already has
been approved by the General Assembly.
"While the majority of funding for this project will come from
private sources, it is vital that these funds are approved in order for the
fund raising, museum design, program development and marketing to
begin," the governor said.
Wise said that besides organizing an ambitious program of fund
raising, he will cement the partnerships that will be required to advance the
Civil War Center from a dream to a reality.
The center already is scheduled to receive one of the nation's
finest collections of African-American military uniforms, weapons and
related items.
And it has assembled a group of nationally recognized Civil War
historians to serve as historical advisers for the project. They are James H.
McPherson of Princeton University, Thavolia Glymph of Duke University, Gary W.
Gallagher of the University of Virginia and Charles B. Dew of
Williams College.
Contact Gary Robertson at (804) 649-6346 or grobertson@timesdispatch.com
<mailto:grobertson@timesdispatch.com>
Jim Campi, Director of Policy and Communications
The Civil War Preservation Trust
1331 H Street N.W., Suite 1001
Washington, D.C. 20005
Phone: 202-367-1861
Fax: 202-367-1865
Website: <http://www.civilwar.org>
January 8, 2001
Dig gives historians a
handle on Roper's Knob at Franklin
By SHELLEY MAYS
Associated Press Newswires
FRANKLIN, Tenn. (AP) - New information has been unearthed from Roper's
Knob that now can be added to the history books to strengthen Franklin's
role in the Civil War.
After three months of digging, state archaeologists have completed the
excavation of Franklin's highest point, which served as a fortified
signal station for Union troops in 1863 and was a key communication link
between Nashville and Murfreesboro.
The archaeological investigation of Roper's Knob, located between
Liberty Pike and Mack Hatcher Parkway, was designed to determine the
nature of surviving archaeological remains related to both military
occupation and civilian use.
The most significant find is a large, square blockhouse that measures 42
feet side to side with a heavy timber fortification and earthworks. The
average blockhouse was 18-by-30 feet.
"It was eight-sided but not a true octagon, which was originally
thought," said Ben Nance, a historic archaeologist for the
Tennessee Division of Archaeology.
"Blockhouses were used extensively in Middle Tennessee as railroad
defenses. They could build them near a railroad bridge or trestle and
could be operated by a small contingent of men.
"This one was large enough for 60 men."
However, very few military artifacts were found because, Nance said,
collectors already have been digging them out for years. A few artifacts
were unearthed, such as Union buttons, Minie balls and gun parts.
Another significant discovery is a pre-Civil War house about 200 feet
from the blockhouse believed to have been the home of George Roper Sr.
"The foundation of the home is so substantial. It indicates either
a stone cottage or a large house with a basement with a log house on
top," Nance said.
Brought to the surface at the house site were artifacts that indicated
mid-19th-century dates, such as pieces of decorative ceramics, glass and
bone buttons.
Historical written accounts by Park Marshall, a local historian and
former mayor of Franklin who was a boy during the Civil War, wrote that
a man named Roper lived on the hill for many years but never owned the
land.
The archaeological project was made possible by grants from the
Tennessee Historical Commission, Tennessee War Commission and 80
volunteers who helped with the digging.
"It was like a dream come true for me. I was a frustrated
archaeologist in college. I just got too busy and didn't do it,"
said volunteer Joyce Peck of Franklin. "It's exciting to be able to
touch history that has been buried for 200 years."
The next step for Nance and other state archaeologists is to complete an
analysis, catalog artifacts and write a report. That work will probably
last until next summer.
The Heritage Foundation, which purchased land on Roper's Knob for
$440,000 in 1996, plans to eventually open the 57-acre passive park to
the community. For now, the preservation group will continue to cut
trails.
"Our plan for 2001 would be to add benches and trail signage, and
add a conservation easement," said Mary Pearce, Heritage Foundation
executive director.
The park is open only to Heritage Foundation members for now, but
special arrangements with groups or schools can be made with signed
releases.
Another task is developing a parking plan for better access to Roper's
Knob.
"My biggest fantasy for Roper's Knob is to reconstruct the signal
post as it was during the Civil War," Pearce said.
In the future, Roper's Knob may be added to the network of Franklin area
Civil War sites - sites that include Carnton Plantation and Carter House
- and save green space from development.
"Roper's Knob is another excellent interpretive area regarding
Franklin's role in the Civil War," said Thomas Cartwright, director
of the Carter House. "You might not have any interest in the Civil
War, but when it comes to saving green space, everyone is a
winner."
Information gained from this project will provide the basis for future
excavations and will help facilitate the long-range preservation of
Roper's Knob, which was placed on the National Register of Historic
Places on April 6, 2000.
"I hope we can come back to it," said Nance. "There is a
little bit more we could learn up here. But it all depends on
funding."
The state owns 22 acres on top of historic Roper's Knob. It is illegal
for individuals to dig for artifacts on state property.
This is good news from Franklin, but any examination of the site of the
Battle of Franklin today underscores the disastrous consequences of what
CAN happen when not enough people care about preservating a battlefield
site.
Thankfully, more and more people in the Franklin area are realizing that
they, in fact, have a valuable treasure in their community which has
been on the verge of almost total destruction. It is good to see that
community interest is finally turning in the direction of the
preservation of what is
left of the battlefield where the Confederate army lost its most
disastrous battle of the Civil War.
January 4, 2001
Subject: Enfield
Bluing FYI
The attached linked article makes a very convincing case for not
removing the bluing on Enfields.
Craig S. Mickelson
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Quarters/1864/enf/enfblue.htm
January 2, 2001
Dear Camp Members,
Some of you know that I have been working on obtaining a proper grave marker for a Civil War vet from Vermont who is buried in Stevens Point, WI. He is Charles W. Dolloff - a Medal of Honor (MOH) recipient. Mr. Dolloff's grave made no mention of his Civil War service or the fact that he was a MOH recipient.
After some "problems" (and a year and a half) I finally received a proper marker for Mr. Dolloff. I would like to plan a dedication ceremony for May 19th, 2001. Please let me know if you and your Camp (and/or your reenactment group) would wish to participate.
Please pass this on to other Camp members. My home telephone is (715) 344-0671 or you/they can respond via e-mail.
Thanks,
Don Strube, Patriotic Instructor
Old Abe Camp #8
Here is one of many responses
regarding the "new" educational standards of learning in the
state of Virginia. Only one person out of several dozen responding
thought it was a good idea to "dumb down" American history in
favor of diversity.
Several have asked what can be done...
The "reality" answer is, probably nothing.
BUT--the only hope is to get to the Governor
Gov. Jim Gilmore
State Capitol
Richmond VA 23219
website www.state.va.us <http://www.state.va.us>
Try to convince him that this sort of
thing weakens our national culture.
Give him a holler... (And be NICE...)
Thanks, Laurie, and all the others who responded.
It sure does bother me! I teach in Upper Michigan, and I would be
outraged if they pulled this kind of thing here! We're still working on
trying to get the people to understand the causes of the Civil War and
what the Confederates were fighting for. While diversity is one of our
Core Democratic Values, it doesn't mean we should "dumb down"
America. This is exactly what's happening in a lot of schools today.
While we are comprised of many different nationalities. We seem to lose
sight that we are AMERICANS, not African-Americans, Asian-Americans,
German-Americans, etc. It's one of those things that really bugs me.
While I feel that everything adds to our history, why do the educational
"experts" in Virginia feel that you have to replace or dump
anyone or anything? There's no reason why all of them can't be included
in a full program. You're not teaching for mastery at elementary levels
in social studies. You're giving them an introduction that they can
build on. Kids need to get a thread for the continuity of our history,
and leaving anyone out destroys this thread of understanding.
Laurie Rasmussen
2d Wisconsin
New Millennium, Same
Old Problem
Early grades to `simplify' history
Keller, Pocahontas replace Southern generals in lessons
Vaishali Honawar
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
12/31/2000
Confederate Gens. Robert E. Lee, Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson,
and J.E.B. Stuart will be glossed over until the fifth grade as Helen
Keller and Pocahontas become Virginia's new classroom heroes.
A state Board of Education committee believes turning away from the
South's three most beloved political and military heroes will make it
easier to teach fourth graders about the Civil War, possibly by removing
sentiment and emotion from the still-politically-charged struggle.
Fourth graders should get a "simplified" version of Virginia
history, the committee said in issuing revisions to the state's
Standards of Learning for History.
The recommendation has drawn fire from those who see it is an effort to
water down the state's Confederate tradition. Board members shouldn't
worry that students have to memorize too many names in lower grades,
said Steve Hunt, president of the group PASS-SOL, a pro-SOL group of
parents and students in Virginia.
"They master the entire English language before they start
school," he said.
Simplifying things will "lead to removing elements of history from
the curriculum," Mr. Hunt said.
He called it "inappropriate" to "leave out the names of
people associated with the American Civil War and American
history."
J. Brandon Bell, a Board of Education member who co-chaired the Review
and Revision Committee for the History and Social Science tests, said,
"We did debate back and forth; we wondered if we should have any
names at all."
Mr. Bell added: "When you have 80 people in a committee, you have
trouble agreeing what names to use."
Members included Virginia politicians, teachers and local school
officials.
The committee's deliberations occurred against the backdrop of protests
against flying the Confederate flag in South Carolina's state capitol
and a variety of arguments over honoring Confederate traditions in
Virginia, particularly among members of the the black- controlled
Richmond City Council.
Mr. Bell said Lee would not disappear altogether - he would suddenly
appear in the fifth- and sixth-grade history classes.
The committee decided teachers should focus on other historical names,
including women, and on places on the globe that reveal cultural
diversity.
First graders, for example, would learn about the Indian princess
Pocahontas and not just Capt. John Smith, Virginia's most famous
settler. Second graders would learn of Helen Keller - an uplifting tale
of a woman who was born blind, deaf and mute, but who learned to speak
through determination and courage.
Third graders will learn about the highly developed West African empire
of Mali, to show the continent was not just a backward supplier of
slaves.
Also under the revised SOLs, more emphasis would be bestowed on
Confucianism and the Indus Valley, an ancient civilization between India
and Pakistan that disappeared thousands of years ago.
Public hearings on the revisions will be held around the state,
including in Fairfax on Jan. 8. History and social science SOL tests
typically have had the lowest scores among all SOLs. This year, an
average 49 percent of the state's fifth graders failed the test, as did
50 percent of eighth graders. High schoolers in some parts of the state
did worse, posting failure rates of 60 percent on average.
Standards of Learning in History, English, Science and Math were adopted
by the Virginia Department of Education in 1995 as part of a major
overhaul of the education system.
Tests based on the standards have been administered since 1998. By 2004,
all high school students will have to pass the tests to graduate. One of
the reasons behind the revisions, Mr. Bell said, was to introduce
children to other cultures. "One of the teachers on the K-3 review
team said that the first time African-American children hear of their
ancestors, they hear about them as slaves. So we decided to include the
empire of Mali." Second graders learning geography would be asked
to locate China and Egypt on world maps and where Powhatan, Sioux and
Pueblo Indians lived on U.S. maps. Third-graders would have to know the
parts of the Americas explored by Christopher Columbus, Juan Ponce de
Leon, Jacques Cartier and Christopher Newport. Higher grades will learn
about Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism under world history.
INS AND OUTS OF SOL TESTS
The following changes would be incorporated into elementary curricula
under proposed revisions to the history and social sciences parts of
Virginia's Standards of Learning tests.
IN
>>Pocahontas
>>George Washington
>>Betsy Ross
>>Abraham Lincoln
>>Presidents Day
>>Fourth of July
>>The Washington Monument
>>Christopher Columbus
>>Juan Ponce de Leon
>>The Powhatan, the Sioux, the Pueblo
>>Thomas Jefferson
>>Rosa Parks
>>Martin Luther King
>>Thurgood Marshall
>>Harlem Renaissance
>>Pearl Harbor
>>Ancient river civilizations, including Egypt, Mesopotamia, the
Indus Valley,
>>the civilization of the Hebrews, Phoenicians and Kush
>>Alexander the Great
>>Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism
>>East African kingdoms
>>West African civilizations
OUT
>>Robert E. Lee
>>Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson
>>Paul Revere
>>Johnny Appleseed
>>Booker T. Washington
>>Harriet Tubman
>>Davy Crockett
>>John Paul Jones
>>Jane Addams
>>Thanksgiving and the Pilgrims
>>Independence Day
>>Flag Day
>>Veterans Day
>>Memorial Day
>>Jamestown
>>Harry F. Byrd
>>
Source: Virginia Department of Education
January 2, 2001
Dear Friends,
As a member of the comittee to revise the "uniform and equipment
standards" of our handbook, I am dismayed at some of the responses
and rumors floating around. I cannot see how the new proposed document
can be perceived as excessive or how stereotypical words like
"stitch counting" can be applied to it. The previous document
in the handbook had some items that were outdated or that needed
elaboration- the new version sent out in the Fugleman is a PROPOSAL of
the changes we in the committee felt needed the be changed. The reason
this revised section in the handbook was published in the newsletter and
posted on our website was so that each member of the 2nd could review
it, take notes, form an opinion, spot likes, dislikes and discrepancies.
This way, at the Assoc. meeting an INFORMED and CIVIL discussion can
take place when it comes time to vote on the document's ratification. I
am really happy to see that some have taken the time to look the
proposes over and bring to light some oversights that have been made by
us in the comittee, without being judgemental or abrasive-thankyou.
On a personal note, I am offended by finger pointing,
name calling and derogative terms. I suppose I fall into the category of
"young" and even possibly a "whelp", but I am a
proud member of Company E, the Oshkosh Volunteers and I'm NOT a Mudill
wanabbe nor a "stitch Nazi"!! Neither are our comrades in Co.
A and I can't make the connection on how the proposed guideline changes
for the 2nd Wisc. have one iota to do with that company. I personally
would like an explanation for the connection because I'm baffled.
Making one company or group of individuals out to be "bad
guys" only drives a wedge through our grand regiment. A good friend
of mine in Co. E has always said that each company in the Assoc. is
different, but that we all have so much more in common than than what is
different- think about it pards. Everyone in reenacting has their own
standards- that is obvious, and sometimes one person's standards may not
agree with yours. Ask yourself however, the next time you are angered,
embarrassed, annoyed or made uncomfortable by the soldier next to you,
is it because they are acting like a jerk, personally wronged you, or
are forcing something upon you, or is it because they think a little
differently than you. I urge especially the regimental and comapny
officers, both field and administrative positions, to be unifiers and
NOT dividers in our regiment. Like it or not, this is part of your duty
when you wear those shoulder straps or stripes-please do so.
Most Respectfully,
Matt Smith
a young whelp in Co. E